4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis of simple and regenerative Brayton cycles for the concentrated solar power applications

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages 428-443

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.079

Keywords

Brayton cycle; Working fluid selection; Thermal efficiency; Critical point

Funding

  1. Energy Production and Infrastructure Center (EPIC) at UNC Charlotte
  2. American Public Power Association (APPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic multi-step method was developed for selection of the best working fluid(s) for the simple and regenerative Brayton cycles. The first step of the method involves development of the thermodynamic model of a cycle and development of theoretical expressions for its thermodynamic performance (thermal efficiency and net specific work output). In the second step, parametric calculations were performed for nine working fluids over a range of cycle operating conditions corresponding to the concentrated solar power plants (CSPs) to determine the effect of cycle operating conditions and thermo-physical properties of the working fluids on cycle performance. The statistical regression analysis is used in the third step to develop correlations for the cycle efficiency and net specific work of the same form as theoretical expressions developed in Step 1. The last step in the process involves construction of performance maps, where performance parameters, such as thermal efficiency and net specific work output are presented as functions of the cycle operating conditions. The performance map for thermal efficiency shows that, depending on the operating conditions, either N-2 or CO2 are the best choices of the working fluids. However, considering the net specific work output, He is the best working fluid over the entire analyzed range of the cycle operating conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available