4.7 Article

Numerical investigation on optimal number of longitudinal fins in horizontal annular phase change unit at different wall temperatures

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 384-392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.029

Keywords

Latent heat storage; Melting; Heat transfer enhancement; Fins

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378426, 51678488]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team of Building Environment and Energy Efficiency [2015TD0015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number, shape, and size of the fins utilized in a phase change unit form the key parameters affecting the heat transfer process in the unit. To the best of our knowledge, there are no relevant literature reports on the optimal number of fins in a horizontal annular phase change unit for different wall temperatures. To investigate the correlation between the number of fins and the wall temperature, in this study, based on a numerical simulation using the enthalpy-porosity model, we examine the phase-change material (PCM) melt with different numbers of installed fins (n = 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) at five different constant wall temperatures. The calculated results are analyzed and compared with those of the case without fins. The study results indicate that the addition of fins can effectively accelerate the PCM melting rate and shorten the melting time; further, the wall temperature also significantly affects the melting rate. We define the time-average Nusselt number ((N) over bar (u)) as an indicator of heat transfer efficiency to analyze the heat transfer mechanism. The influence of the fin number and wall temperature on N-u and the variation in N-u at different stages of the melting process are investigated. According to the variation in the average wall heat flux, it can be concluded that the fin number has an optimal value for a specific wall temperature. The optimal number of fins according to this study is 10. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available