4.7 Article

Analysis of the influence of heat loss factors on the overall performance of utility-scale parabolic trough solar collectors

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 1077-1091

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.065

Keywords

Parabolic trough solar collector; Concentrating solar power; Solar thermal electricity; Heat loss; Overall performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476165, 51476164, 61505211]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB0905102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For parabolic trough solar collectors, several factors (such as the amount of the gas in the evacuated annulus, the absorber emissivity, the wind speed and temperature distributions of the absorber, the glass envelope and the heat transfer fluid) are critical to influence their heat losses and consequently their overall performance. Therefore, this study develops a mathematical model for thermal behaviors of parabolic trough solar collectors in consideration of these impact factors. Additionally, to validate this model, experimental data were measured for a test facility. This facility includes a utility-scale loop of parabolic trough solar collectors which can be applicable to solar thermal power plants. The comparison indicates a good agreement between predicted and measured temperatures of the heat transfer fluid at the outlet of the collectors. Using this model, parametric studies were conducted for impact factors. These factors are the pressure of the H-2 or air from 0.01 to 1E5 Pa, the absorber emissivity from a measured basis to its four times, the wind speed from 2 to 12 m/s, and temperature distributions with and without the concentrated solar flux. Consequently, several conclusions were drawn by analyzing how they influence heat losses and further overall performance under specified boundary conditions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available