4.7 Article

LES simulation and experimental validation of the unsteady aerodynamics of blunt wind turbine airfoils

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 911-923

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.093

Keywords

Blunt airfoil; Wake; Unsteady; Transition; Large eddy simulation; Experiment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776204]
  2. Research Equipment Development Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [YZ201513]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to investigate the unsteady performance of blunt wind turbine airfoils caused by boundary layer separation and wake eddies, this paper studies the aerodynamic performance by large eddy simulation (LES) and wind tunnel experiment at a Reynolds number of 2.62 x 10 boolean AND 5. The blunt airfoils are obtained by enlarging the trailing edge of the DU 91-W2-250 airfoil to 6% and 10% chords symmetrically on both pressure and suction sides of the airfoil. The simulation was carried out with the incompressible finite volume Navier-Stokes code EllipSys3D; and, the experiment was done in a wind tunnel with a crosssection of 0.5 m x 0.5 m by measuring the surface pressure and wake velocities using ESP-64HD pressure scanner and TSI hot-wire anemometer. The unsteady wake was captured by hot-wire in the wind tunnel, and LES with EllipSys3D. Both experiment and LES show that the spectrum of aerodynamic forces has a broadband nature which is in coincidence with the wake eddies, implying that the unsteady Karman vortex sheet is the driving mechanism of the force fluctuation. Moreover, the trailing edge size affects the separation bubbles and transition process in the boundary layer. It shows that the boundary layer near the leading edge is unstable in the spanwise direction, which is characterized by low frequency waves. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available