4.5 Article

Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception

Journal

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198

Keywords

wrist proprioception; wrist robot; discrimination threshold; quantitative measurements; robotic rehabilitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Impaired proprioception severely affects the control of gross and fine motor function. However, clinical assessment of proprioceptive deficits and its impact on motor function has been difficult to elucidate. Recent advances in haptic robotic interfaces designed for sensorimotor rehabilitation enabled the use of such devices for the assessment of proprioceptive function. Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of a wrist robot system to determine proprioceptive discrimination thresholds for two different DoFs of the wrist. Specifically, we sought to accomplish three aims: first, to establish data validity; second, to show that the system is sensitive to detect small differences in acuity; third, to establish test-retest reliability over repeated testing. Methodology: Eleven healthy adult subjects experienced two passive wrist movements and had to verbally indicate which movement had the larger amplitude. Based on a subject's response data, a psychometric function was fitted and the wrist acuity threshold was established at the 75% correct response level. A subset of five subjects repeated the experimentation three times (T1, T2, and T3) to determine the test-retest reliability. Results: Mean threshold for wrist flexion was 2.15 degrees +/- 0.43 degrees and 1.52 degrees +/- 0.36 degrees for abduction. Encoder resolutions were 0.0075 degrees (flexion-extension) and 0.0032 degrees (abduction-adduction). Motor resolutions were 0.2 degrees (flexion-extension) and 0.3 degrees (abduction-adduction). Reliability coefficients were r(T2-T1) = 0.986 and r(T3-T2) = 0.971. Conclusion: We currently lack established norm data on the proprioceptive acuity of the wrist to establish direct validity. However, the magnitude of our reported thresholds is physiological, plausible, and well in line with available threshold data obtained at the elbow joint. Moreover, system has high resolution and is sensitive enough to detect small differences in acuity. Finally, the system produces reliable data over repeated testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available