3.9 Article

Attitudinal and behavioural approaches to improving waste management on construction projects in Australia: benefits and limitations

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 137-147

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2015.1033815

Keywords

waste management; Australia; behaviours; attitudes; construction projects

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Linkage grant [LP110100156]
  2. Zero Waste SA
  3. Australian Institute of Building Surveyors
  4. Australian Institute of Building
  5. Campbelltown City Council
  6. Hodgkinson Architects
  7. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
  8. Shenzhen Jianyi International Engineering Consultants Ltd
  9. Shenzhen University
  10. University of Karlsruhe
  11. Australian Research Council [LP110100156] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aims to understand the attitudes and behaviours of stakeholders towards waste management and consequently identify ways of improving waste management practices in construction projects. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The findings reveal that most of the decisions in construction projects are based on their financial returns unless there is a special requirement to comply with Green Star or any other sustainable building rating system. Even though there is a trend towards environment-friendly construction, contractors are favourable towards methods involving financial incentives. Results also indicate that private developers are more price-driven compared with government clients. Findings reveal the necessity of enforcing legislation to improve waste management practices until such practices become culturally embedded in organizations across the supply chain. Similarly, end users' motivation towards waste management was also identified as a key to encouraging stakeholders of construction projects and improving their attitudes and behaviours towards waste management practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available