3.8 Article

The Process of Engaging Members From Two Underserved Populations in the Development of Interventions to Promote the Uptake of the HPV Vaccine

Journal

HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 443-453

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1524839914559776

Keywords

community-engaged research; HPV vaccine; cervical cancer health disparities

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [R21CA152803, P50CA105632, P30CA016058]
  2. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a community-engaged research process used to develop multilevel interventions (caregivers, providers, system) to improve the uptake of human papillomavirus vaccine among adolescents by partnering with members from two underserved populations in Ohio. We began by conducting focus groups to better understand the knowledge and attitudes of caregivers and providers about the human papillomavirus vaccine and to develop teams of community members to assist with development of the interventions. The process continued with conducting writing sessions to determine the content and format of the interventions, and initial feedback was obtained during review sessions to refine the interventions prior to implementation. Using this approach, we were able to consider contextual factors that made the interventions more acceptable and relevant to members of the priority populations. Challenges included development and maintenance of a team of community members to participate in the entire intervention development process, rejection of ideas presented by academic researchers, the need to balance community members' suggestions with what was known from evidence-based research, and the time, cost, and effort associated with partnering with community members. The benefits, however, outweigh the challenges associated with using a community-engaged research process to develop interventions aimed at reducing cancer disparities among underserved populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available