4.7 Article

Thermodynamic analysis of a novel hybrid liquid air energy storage system based on the utilization of LNG cold energy

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 641-650

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.041

Keywords

Liquid air energy storage; LNG cold energy; Organic rankine cycle; Thermodynamics analysis

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621065]
  2. Scientific and Technological Project of Qinghai Province [2017-GX-101]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province [2017-ZJ-932Q]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid air energy storage (LAES) is a promising solution for electricity energy storage and grid load shifting. The storage and application of cold energy can significantly affect the performance of LAES systems. A stable and sufficient source of cold energy in the liquefaction process is the key factor for the stable and efficient operation of an LAES system. Hence, a novel hybrid LAES system combined with organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems based on the utilization of liquefied natural gas (LNG) cold energy is proposed in this paper. In the charging process, the LNG helps cool the compressed air, and the cold energy of the liquid air and excess compression heat are utilized in a two-stage ORC system to generate additional electricity during the discharging process. A mathematical model comprising energy and exergy analyses was developed to analyze the performance of the proposed system and the influence of key parameters. Compared to standalone LAES systems, the cold energy storage system is extremely simplified in the proposed system, and higher electricity storage efficiency and density are obtained. Therefore, the proposed system has a promising prospect in LNG terminals owing to its stability and ease of implementation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available