4.7 Article

Thermochemical performance of solar driven CO2 reforming of methane in volumetric reactor with gradual foam structure

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 545-555

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.086

Keywords

CO2 reforming of methane; Solar energy; Volumetric reactor; Porous foam

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51676061, 51606034]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016T90283]
  3. fundamental research funds for the central universities [HIT. NSRIF. 201706]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solar driven CO2 reforming of methane has attracted increasing interest, due to the greenhouse effect and the depletion of fossil fuel energy. The design of foam structure parameters in volumetric solar reactor significantly affects the transport phenomena and overall reforming performance. A numerical model is developed in this study, coupling the conduction, convection and radiative heat transfer with the chemical reaction kinetics. The radiative transfer in foam structure is solved by the modified P1 approximation, and local thermal non-equilibrium model is used to account for the temperature difference between the fluid and solid phases. The reforming process in solar reactors with gradual foam structure parameter (porosity and cell size) both in axial and radial directions is analyzed. Thermal and reforming performances in different configurations are compared in detail. The results indicate that the methane conversion almost increases gradually with the increasing of porosity and cell size for the reactor with uniform foam structure. The decreasing designs of structure parameter either in axial or radial direction have better performance than the increasing ones. Besides, the increasing and decreasing designs in radial direction have a noticeable difference in the mole fraction distribution of reactants and products from those in axial directions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available