4.7 Article

Barriers and bridges to the integration of social-ecological resilience and law

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 332-337

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/140294

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Geological Survey
  2. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
  3. University of Nebraska Lincoln
  4. US Fish and Wildlife Service
  5. Wildlife Management Institute
  6. August T Larsson Foundation of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a fundamental difference between the ways in which ecologists and lawyers view uncertainty: in the study of ecology, uncertainty provides a catalyst for exploration, whereas uncertainty is antithetical to the rule of law. This issue is particularly troubling in environmental management, where the tensions between law and ecology become apparent. Rather than acknowledge uncertainties in management actions, legal frameworks often force a false sense of certainty in linking cause and effect. While adaptive management has been developed to deal with uncertainty, laws and legal wrangling can be obstacles to implementation. In this article, we recommend resilience-based governance adaptive governance as a means to begin bridging the gap between law and ecology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available