4.7 Article

Citizen science helps predict risk of emerging infectious disease

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 189-194

Publisher

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/140299

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) part of the joint NSF-National Institutes of Health Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases program [DEB-EF-0622677, EF-0622770]
  2. US Forest Service's State and Private Forestry Organization
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1430134] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1115607] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engaging citizen scientists is becoming an increasingly popular technique for collecting large amounts of ecological data while also creating an avenue for outreach and public support for research. Here we describe a unique study, in which citizen scientists played a key role in the spatial prediction of an emerging infectious disease. The yearly citizen-science program called Sudden Oak Death (SOD) Blitz engages and educates volunteers in detecting the causal pathogen during peak windows of seasonal disease expression. We used these data - many of which were collected from under-sampled urban ecosystems - to develop predictive maps of disease risk and to inform stakeholders on where they should prioritize management efforts. We found that continuing the SOD Blitz program over 6 consecutive years improved our understanding of disease dynamics and increased the accuracy of our predictive models. We also found that self-identified non-professionals were just as capable of detecting the disease as were professionals. Our results indicate that using long-term citizen-science data to predict the risk of emerging infectious plant diseases in urban ecosystems holds substantial promise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available