4.5 Article

Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Strategy through Multiway PCA and Multivariate Inference

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en11040749

Keywords

wind turbine; condition monitoring; fault detection; principal component analysis; multivariate statistical hypothesis testing

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [DPI2014-58427-C2-1-R, DPI2017-82930-C2-1-R, DPI2017-82930-C2-2-R]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017 SGR 388]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article states a condition monitoring strategy for wind turbines using a statistical data-driven modeling approach by means of supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data. Initially, a baseline data-based model is obtained from the healthy wind turbine by means of multiway principal component analysis (MPCA). Then, when the wind turbine is monitorized, new data is acquired and projected into the baseline MPCA model space. The acquired SCADA data are treated as a random process given the random nature of the turbulent wind. The objective is to decide if the multivariate distribution that is obtained from the wind turbine to be analyzed (healthy or not) is related to the baseline one. To achieve this goal, a test for the equality of population means is performed. Finally, the results of the test can determine that the hypothesis is rejected (and the wind turbine is faulty) or that there is no evidence to suggest that the two means are different, so the wind turbine can be considered as healthy. The methodology is evaluated on a wind turbine fault detection benchmark that uses a 5 MW high-fidelity wind turbine model and a set of eight realistic fault scenarios. It is noteworthy that the results, for the presented methodology, show that for a wide range of significance, alpha is an element of[1%, 13%], the percentage of correct decisions is kept at 100%; thus it is a promising tool for real-time wind turbine condition monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available