4.7 Article

Collaboration, interdisciplinary thinking, and communication: new approaches to K-12 ecology education

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 37-43

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/140130

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-1026415, BCS-1026865, DEB-1235828, GEO-0816168, OIA-1208927]
  2. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) [ALKR-2009-04931]
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1026865] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1026415, 1235828] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Office of Integrative Activities
  8. Office Of The Director [1208927] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. ARS [ARS-0423561, 813350] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecologists often engage in global-scale research through partnerships among scientists from many disciplines. Such research projects require collaboration, interdisciplinary thinking, and strong communication skills. We advocate including these three practices as an integral part of ecology education at the kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) level, as opposed to waiting until the graduate level. Current discourse about K-12 ecology education focuses on promoting lessons in which students learn science by conducting research rather than simply reading textbooks. Here, we present five models of K-12 ecology education programs that emphasize collaboration, interdisciplinary thinking, and communication within student research projects on the ecology of drylands and other ecosystems. Such practices not only provide additional skills for future ecologists but also prepare students for success in any career as well as for ecologically literate citizenship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available