4.6 Article

Cobalt carbonate hydroxides as advanced battery-type materials for supercapatteries: Influence of morphology on performance

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 259, Issue -, Pages 1037-1044

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.009

Keywords

Amorphous; Trasatti plot; Battery-type; Nanoflakes; Polyhedron flower

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2017M3A7B4041987]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0093823]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIP) [2015R1A5A1037668]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Layered materials provide good electrochemical performance, but insufficient rate capability, which is the main issue in energy storage. Herein, we propose a facile synthesis of Co-2(CO3)(OH)(2) nanoflakes and polyhedron flowers supported on Ni foam, a novel binder-free electrode. Power law revealed that Co-2(CO3)(OH)(2) stores charge by a battery-type mechanism at the peak potential. The nanoflakes store more internal surface charge than the polyhedron-flower, which was confirmed via Trasatti plot. Benefiting from amorphous nanostructure, unique morphology and high surface area, the nanoflakes shows good performance. The areal capacitance (2111 mF cm(-2)), rate capability (80%), and energy density (0.152 mWh cm(-2)) are comparable to recent reports. The results suggest that the amorphous Co-2(CO3)(OH)(2) nanoflakes are a suitable cathode candidate for the supercapattery. The assembled supercapattery (ASC) provides high specific capacitance (91 F g(-1)), high energy density (26.22 Wh kg(-1) at power density 828 W kg(-1)), and long cycle life (specific capacitance retention of 85% over 4000 cycles). The ASC device shows good potential in the field of energy storage devices. (c) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available