4.7 Article

Bayesian Nonlinear Hyperspectral Unmixing With Spatial Residual Component Analysis

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 174-185

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCI.2015.2481603

Keywords

Hyperspectral imagery; nonlinear spectral unmixing; residual component analysis; Gamma Markov random field; Bayesian estimation

Funding

  1. Direction Generale de l'armement, French Ministry of Defence
  2. SuSTaIN program EPSRC at the Department of Mathematics, University of Bristol [EP/D063485/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/J015180/1]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D063485/1, EP/J015180/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/J015180/1, EP/D063485/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new Bayesian model and algorithm for nonlinear unmixing of hyperspectral images. The proposed model represents the pixel reflectances as linear combinations of the endmembers, corrupted by nonlinear (with respect to the endmembers) terms and additive Gaussian noise. Prior knowledge about the problem is embedded in a hierarchical model that describes the dependence structure between the model parameters and their constraints. In particular, a gamma Markov random field is used to model the joint distribution of the nonlinear terms, which are expected to exhibit significant spatial correlations. An adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is then proposed to compute the Bayesian estimates of interest and perform Bayesian inference. This algorithm is equipped with a stochastic optimisation adaptation mechanism that automatically adjusts the parameters of the gamma Markov random field by maximum marginal likelihood estimation. Finally, the proposed methodology is demonstrated through a series of experiments with comparisons using synthetic and real data and with competing state-of-the-art approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available