4.6 Article

Heterogeneously catalyzed two-step cascade electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethanol

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 274, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.072

Keywords

CO2 reduction; Cascade catalysis; Ethanol; Liquid fuel; Electrochemistry

Funding

  1. Kentucky Department for Energy Development and Independence [PON2 127 1500002410]
  2. Conn Center for Renewable Energy Research at the University of Louisville

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to liquid fuels is a promising route to a carbon-neutral, energy-dense storage of intermittent renewable electricity. However, electrocatalysts generally suffer from high overpotential and poor selectivity for multi-carbon products such as ethanol, and efforts to enhance such catalysts are limited by scaling relations which inhibit a simultaneous optimization of each elementary electrochemical step. In this work, the multistep proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction for the conversion of CO2 to C2H5OH was strategically divided into two independently optimized steps in a sequential cascade reaction using heterogeneous electrocatalysts to convert CO2 to CO and CO to C2H5OH within a single integrated electrochemical system. The exclusion of CO2 reactant from the second-stage electrolyzer was observed to be critical for maintaining appreciable ethanol selectivity. The cascade system produced C2H5OH at an overall faradaic efficiency of 11.0% at an average applied potential of -0.52 V vs. RHE, making it highly competitive with known single-step electrocatalysts for ethanol production from CO2. This performance was despite limited conversion of the intermediate CO between cascade steps (similar to 6.4%), and reactor design improvements to enhance the conversion could lead to significantly enhanced ethanol production performance. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available