4.6 Article

Tuning the component ratio and corresponding sodium storage properties of layer-tunnel hybrid Na0.6Mn1-xNixO2 cathode by a simple cationic Ni2+ doping strategy

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages 63-70

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.006

Keywords

Sodium ion batteries; Manganese-based oxide; Layer-tunnel hybrid cathode; Structure component tuning; Cationic doping

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21373008, 21711530143, 21506133]
  2. National Key Research and Development of China [2016YFB0100202]
  3. Science and Technology Pillar Program of Sichuan University [2014GZ0077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manganese (Mn)-based cathodes with advantages of low-cost, environmental benign, high energy density are crucial for the commercial process of sodium ion batteries (SIBs). Layer-tunnel hybrid cathode, which aims to integrate high capacity of P2-type layered structure with excellent cycling stability, superior rate performance of tunnel structure, deserves great research efforts. To further enhance the respective performance, the ratio of layer-tunnel component in the hybrid Na0.6Mn1-xNixO2 was adjusted by a simple cationic Ni2+ doping route. The crystal structure and electrochemical behavior of Na0.6Mn1-xNixO2 were carefully detected, compared and analyzed. The comprehensive results evidenced that the layered component ratio would rapidly increase with Ni2+ doping. The structural parameters of pure phase would also be affected by varied Ni2+ content. And 5% Ni doping could be an optimized point in terms of reversible capacity, cycling stability, rate performance and reaction kinetics. This study would reveal the dual-function of cationic doping in both macro scale component ratio and atomic scale crystal lattice parameter, and grasp new insight into the design and optimization of high performance hybrid cathode for SIBs. (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available