4.6 Article

Amide-based molten electrolyte with hybrid active ions for rechargeable Zn batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages 108-113

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.107

Keywords

Zn batteries; Molten salt; High voltage; Zn dendrite; Low cost

Funding

  1. Programs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21601195, 51625204, 21671196]
  2. Qingdao Science and Technology Program [17-1-1-30-jch]
  3. key research and development plan of Shandong Province P. R. China [2017GGX40119]
  4. China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists of the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rechargeable Zn batteries (ZBs) have received increasing attention due to their cheap, safe and green characteristics, but their further development is generally bottlenecked by lack of compatible electrolytes. Here we report an eco-friendly and low-cost amide-based molten salt (AMS) containing acetamide, lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI) and trifluoromethylsulfonate (Zn(Tfo)(2)) for ZBs. This AMS electrolyte enables a similar to 100% Zn plating/stripping efficiency with long-term stability and suppresses Zn dendrite growth. Based on the Lithorn extraction/insertion on the cathodes and reversible Zn chemistry on the anode in this AMS electrolyte, both Zn/LiMn2O4 and Zn/LiFePO4 batteries show excellent electrochemical performance including large specific capacity (118 and 140 mAh g(-1), respectively) and remarkable cycle life (> 150 cycles). More importantly, by virtue of the electrochemical stability of the AMS, the voltage limit can be significantly increased above 2.15 V for the Zn/LiMn2O4 battery, making full use of the cathode capacity. This finding opens new opportunities for the development of low-cost and high performance ZBs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available