4.6 Article

Terminated nanotubes: Evidence against the dissolution equilibrium theory

Journal

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 80-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.11.025

Keywords

Anodization; Terminated nanotubes; Disproof; Dissolution equilibrium

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51577093, 61171043, 51377085]
  2. PAPD of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [AD20537/003]
  3. Undergraduate Research Training Millions Talents Plan of Nanjing University of Science and Technology [201710288023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical anodizations of metals and alloys have attracted increasing attention as a method to fabricate highly ordered porous films. The popular formation mechanism of porous anodic oxides is dissolution equilibrium theory, which indicates that the equilibrium between oxide growth and dissolution via digging manner at the bottom of pores is the major cause of tubular structure. Here, terminated nanotubes with sealed bottoms were discovered while titanium foils were anodized under different conditions. In one terminated nanotube, oxide at the bottom does not grow whereas dissolution from electrolyte still exists. According to the estimated dissolution rate, it only takes approximately 20 s for the bottom of the terminated nanotube to be penetrated absolutely based on dissolution equilibrium theory. Apparently, most anodizations in this work all last for more than 20 s after the appearance of terminated nanotubes. Therefore, the bottom of the terminated nanotube is bound to be penetrated absolutely. Nevertheless, its bottom is sealed completely, namely the experimental results are not consistent with theoretical results based on dissolution equilibrium theory. Hence, terminated nanotubes are evidence against the dissolution equilibrium theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available