4.5 Article

Towards Optimal Design of Cancer Nanomedicines: Multi-stage Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Solid Tumors

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 2291-2300

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-015-1276-9

Keywords

Drug delivery; Tumor microenvironment; Mathematical modeling; Nano-carriers

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. Marie-Curie Reintegration Grant [FP7-PIRG08-GA-2010-276894]
  3. National Cancer Institute [P01-CA080124, R01-CA126642, R01-CA115767, R01-CA096915, R01-CA085140, T32-CA073479]
  4. DoD Breast Cancer Research Innovator award [W81XWH-10-1-0016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional drug delivery systems for solid tumors are composed of a nano-carrier that releases its therapeutic load. These two-stage nanoparticles utilize the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect to enable preferential delivery to tumor tissue. However, the size-dependency of the EPR, the limited penetration of nanoparticles into the tumor as well as the rapid binding of the particles or the released cytotoxic agents to cancer cells and stromal components inhibit the uniform distribution of the drug and the efficacy of the treatment. Here, we employ mathematical modeling to study the effect of particle size, drug release rate and binding affinity on the distribution and efficacy of nanoparticles to derive optimal design rules. Furthermore, we introduce a new multi-stage delivery system. The system consists of a 20-nm primary nanoparticle, which releases 5-nm secondary particles, which in turn release the chemotherapeutic drug. We found that tuning the drug release kinetics and binding affinities leads to improved delivery of the drug. Our results also indicate that multi-stage nanoparticles are superior over two-stage nano-carriers provided they have a faster drug release rate and for high binding affinity drugs. Furthermore, our results suggest that smaller nanoparticles achieve better treatment outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available