4.7 Article

Multiparameter probability distributions for heavy rainfall modeling in extreme southern Brazil

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages 123-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.06.007

Keywords

Extreme rainfall events; Probabilistic modeling; Kappa; GEV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study region: The study was conducted in the Rio Grande do Sul state - Brazil. Study focus: Studies about heavy rainfall events are crucial for proper flood management in river basins and for the design of hydraulic infrastructure. In Brazil, the lack of runoff monitoring is evident, therefore, designers commonly use rainfall intensityduration-frequency (IDF) relationships to derive streamflow-related information. In order to aid the adjustment of IDF relationships, the probabilistic modelingof extreme rainfall is often employed. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the GEV and Kappa multiparameter probability distributions have more satisfying performance than traditional two-parameter distributions such as Gumbel and Log Normal in the modeling of extreme rainfall events in southern Brazil. Such distributions were adjusted by the L-moments method and the goodness-of-fit was verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Chi-Square, Filliben and Anderson-Darling tests. New hydrological insights for the region: The Anderson-Darling and Filliben tests were the most restrictive in this study. Based on the Anderson-Darling test, it was found that the Kappa distribution presented the best performance, followed by the GEV. This finding provides evidence that these multiparameter distributions result, for the region of study, in greater accuracy for the generation of intensity-duration-frequency curves and the prediction of peak streamflows and design hydrographs. As a result, this finding can support the design of hydraulic structures and flood management in river basins. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available