4.7 Article

Study on adsorption of rhodamine B onto Beta zeolites by tuning SiO2/Al2O3 ratio

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 585-592

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.005

Keywords

Beta zeolite; Dynamics; Isotherms; Adsorption; Rhodamine B

Funding

  1. Talent Introduction Fund of Yangzhou University (CZL)
  2. Zhenjiang High Technology Research Institute of Yangzhou University (CZL)
  3. Key Research Project-Industry Foresight and General Key Technology of Yangzhou [YZ2015020]
  4. Innovative Talent Program of Green Yang Golden Phoenix [yzlyjfih2015CX073]
  5. Yangzhou Social Development Project [YZ2016072]
  6. Jiangsu Province Six Talent Peaks Project [2014-XCL-013]
  7. Jiangsu Industrial-academic-research Prospective Joint Project [BY2016069-02]
  8. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (HXHG)
  9. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PPZY2015B112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exploration of the relationship between zeolite composition and adsorption performance favored to facilitate its better application in removal of the hazardous substances from water. The adsorption capacity of rhodamine B (RB) onto Beta zeolite from aqueous solution was reported. The relationship between SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and adsorption capacity of Beta zeolite for RB was explored. The structure and physical properties of Beta zeolites with various SiO2/Al2O3 ratios were determined by XRD, FTIR, TEM, BET, UV vis and so on characterizations. The adsorption behavior of rhodamine B onto Beta zeolite matched to Langmuir adsorption isotherm and more suitable description for the adsorption kinetics was a pseudo-second-order reaction model. The maximum adsorption capacity of the as-prepared Beta zeolite with SiO2/Al2O3 = 18.4 was up to 27.97 mg/g.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available