4.7 Article

Combined effects of four pesticides and heavy metal chromium (VI) on the earthworm using avoidance behavior as an endpoint

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 191-200

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.067

Keywords

Soil ecotoxicology; Clothianidin; Mixture toxicity; Soil invertebrate

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572028]
  2. Zhejiang Province Key Research and Development Project [2015C02043]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2016-KF-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In natural ecosystems, organisms are commonly exposed to chemical mixtures rather than individual compounds. However, environmental risk is traditionally assessed based on data of individual compounds. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the individual and combined effects of four pesticides [fenobucarb (FEN), chlorpyrifos (CPF), clothianidin (CLO), acetochlor (ACE)] and one heavy metal chromium [Cr(VI)] on the earthworm (Eisenia fetida) using avoidance behavior as an endpoint. Our results indicated that CLO had the highest toxicity to E. fetida, followed by Cr(VI), while FEN showed the least toxicity. Two mixtures of CPF + CLO and Cr(VI) + CPF + CLO + ACE exhibited synergistic effects on the earthworms. The other two quaternary mixtures of CLO + FEN + ACE + Cr(VI) and Cr(VI) + FEN + CPF + ACE at low concentrations also displayed synergistic effects on the earthworms. In contrast, the mixture of Cr(VI) + FEN had the strongest antagonistic effects on E. fetida. Besides, the quinquenary mixture of Cr(VI) +FEN + CPF + CLO + ACE also exerted antagonistic effects. These findings highlighted the importance to evaluate chemical mixtures. Moreover, our data strongly pointed out that the avoidance tests could be used to assess the effects of combined effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available