4.5 Article

Rapid Recovery of Gross Production and Respiration in a Mesic Mountain Big Sagebrush Ecosystem Following Prescribed Fire

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1283-1294

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-017-0218-9

Keywords

carbon cycle; prescribed fire; ecosystem disturbance; sagebrush shrubland; semiarid ecosystems; Great Basin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF EAR 1331872]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [1331872] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of land management actions such as prescribed fire remains a key uncertainty in understanding the spatiotemporal patterns of carbon cycling in the Western USA. We therefore quantified carbon exchange and aboveground carbon stocks following a prescribed fire in a mountain big sagebrush ecosystem located in the northern Great Basin, USA. Specifically, we examined the changes in plant functional type, leaf area index, standing aboveground carbon stocks, net ecosystem production (NEP), gross ecosystem production (GEP), and ecosystem-level respiration (R-eco) for 2years before and 7 of 9years after a prescribed fire. Post-burn GEP and R-eco exceeded pre-burn GEP and R-eco within 2years and remained elevated. The variation in GEP and R-eco provided no evidence of a large and prolonged net efflux of carbon in the 9years after the fire. Rather, NEP indicated the site was a sink before and after the fire, with little change in sink strength associated with the burn. Re-sprouting and recruitment of grasses and forbs drove the post-burn increase in GEP. Woody shrub growth was the dominant control on aboveground biomass accumulation after fire, with shrub aboveground biomass reaching11% of pre-burn biomass after 5years. The rapid recovery of GEP and the growth of mid-successional shrubs suggest ecosystem-level carbon fluxes and stocks can recover rapidly after fire in mesic mountain big sagebrush ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available