4.3 Article

Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the separability' condition in non-parametric, two-stage models of production

Journal

ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 170-191

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/ectj.12103

Keywords

Conditional efficiency; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Free-disposal hull (FDH); Separability; Technical efficiency; Two-stage estimation

Funding

  1. Sapienza Research Awards 2015 [C26H15XNFS]
  2. IAP Research Network of the Belgian State (Belgian Science Policy) [P7/06]
  3. US National Science Foundation [SMA-1243436]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we demonstrate that standard central limit theorem (CLT) results do not hold for means of non-parametric, conditional efficiency estimators, and we provide new CLTs that permit applied researchers to make valid inference about mean conditional efficiency or to compare mean efficiency across groups of producers. The new CLTs are used to develop a test of the restrictive separability' condition that is necessary for second-stage regressions of efficiency estimates on environmental variables. We show that if this condition is violated, not only are second-stage regressions difficult to interpret and perhaps meaningless, but also first-stage, unconditional efficiency estimates are misleading. As such, the test developed here is of fundamental importance to applied researchers using non-parametric methods for efficiency estimation. The test is shown to be consistent and its local power is examined. Our simulation results indicate that our tests perform well both in terms of size and power. We provide a real-world empirical example by re-examining the paper by Aly etal. (1990, Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 211-18) and rejecting the separability assumption implicitly assumed by Aly etal., calling into question results that appear in hundreds of papers that have been published in recent years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available