4.8 Article

Elevated CO2 and water addition enhance nitrogen turnover in grassland plants with implications for temporal stability

Journal

ECOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 674-682

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12935

Keywords

N-15 stable isotopes; global warming; grassland species; nitrogen cycling; plant uptake; pulse-chase; reallocation; resorption; semi-arid

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service Climate Change, Soils and Emissions Program
  2. USDA-Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service Soil Processes Program [2008-35107-18655]
  3. Department of Energy Office of Science (Biological and Environmental Research) [DE-SC0006973]
  4. Western Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic Change Research
  5. National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology [1021559]
  6. Office Of The Director [1208909] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temporal variation in soil nitrogen (N) availability affects growth of grassland communities that differ in their use and reuse of N. In a 7-year-long climate change experiment in a semi-arid grassland, the temporal stability of plant biomass production varied with plant N turnover (reliance on externally acquired N relative to internally recycled N). Species with high N turnover were less stable in time compared to species with low N turnover. In contrast, N turnover at the community level was positively associated with asynchrony in biomass production, which in turn increased community temporal stability. Elevated CO2 and summer irrigation, but not warming, enhanced community N turnover and stability, possibly because treatments promoted greater abundance of species with high N turnover. Our study highlights the importance of plant N turnover for determining the temporal stability of individual species and plant communities affected by climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available