4.6 Article

DISCOVERY OF MASSIVE, MOSTLY STAR FORMATION QUENCHED GALAXIES WITH EXTREMELY LARGE Lyα EQUIVALENT WIDTHS AT z ∼ 3

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 809, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/809/1/L7

Keywords

cosmology: observations; early universe; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift

Funding

  1. JSPS [15340059, 17253001, 19340046, 23244031, 23654068, 25707010]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17253001, 23654068, 23244031, 19340046, 25707010, 15340059] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a discovery of six massive galaxies with both extremely large Ly alpha equivalent widths (EWs) and evolved stellar populations at z similar to 3. These MAssive Extremely STrong Ly alpha emitting Objects (MAESTLOs) have been discovered in our large-volume systematic survey for strong Ly alpha emitters (LAEs) with 12 optical intermediate-band data taken with Subaru/Suprime-Cam in the COSMOS field. Based on the spectral energy distribution fitting analysis for these LAEs, it is found that these MAESTLOs have (1) large rest-frame EWs of EW0 (Ly alpha) similar to 100-300 angstrom, (2) M-star similar to 10(10.5) -10(11.1) M-circle dot, and (3) relatively low specific star formation rates of SFR/M-star similar to 0.03-1 Gyr(-1). Three of the six MAESTLOs have extended Ly alpha emission with a radius of several kiloparsecs, although they show very compact morphology in the HST/ACS images, which correspond to the rest-frame UV continuum. Since the MAESTLOs do not show any evidence for active galactic nuclei, the observed extended Ly alpha emission is likely to be caused by a star formation process including the superwind activity. We suggest that this new class of LAEs, MAESTLOs, provides a missing link from star-forming to passively evolving galaxies at the peak era of the cosmic star formation history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available