4.7 Review

Promoting the use of personally relevant stimuli for investigating patients with disorders of consciousness

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01102

Keywords

disorders of consciousness; music; autobiographical memory; self-processing; internal and external networks; vegetative state; minimally conscious state; coma

Funding

  1. LabEx CeLyA (Centre Lyonnais d'Acoustique) [ANR-10-LABX-60]
  2. ANR CogniComa [ANR-14-CE-5-0013]
  3. France Traumatisme Cranien Association
  4. Gueules Cassees Fondation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sensory stimuli are used to evaluate and to restore cognitive functions and consciousness in patients with a disorder of consciousness (DOG) following a severe brain injury. Although sophisticated protocols can help assessing higher order cognitive functions and awareness, one major drawback is their lack of sensitivity. The aim of the present review is to show that stimulus selection is crucial for an accurate evaluation of the state of patients with disorders of consciousness as it determines the levels of processing that the patient can have with stimulation from his/her environment. The probability to observe a behavioral response or a cerebral response is increased when her/his personal history and/or her/his personal preferences are taken into account. We show that personally relevant stimuli (i.e., with emotional, autobiographical, or self-related characteristics) are associated with clearer signs of perception than are irrelevant stimuli in patients with DOG. Among personally relevant stimuli, music appears to be a promising clinical tool as it boosts perception and cognition in patients with DOG and could also serve as a prognostic tool. We suggest that the effect of music on cerebral processes in patients might reflect the music's capacity to act both on the external and internal neural networks supporting consciousness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available