4.6 Article

Comparing reach scale hyporheic exchange and denitrification induced by instream restoration structures and natural streambed morphology

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 105-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.01.011

Keywords

Surface water; groundwater exchange; Hyporheic; Stream restoration; River restoration; Instream structures; Buried structures; Denitrification

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ENG CBET 1066817]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excess nutrients commonly lead to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. Stream restoration is increasingly popular for nutrient removal enhancing exchange with the reactive hyporheic zone. Hyporheic reactions such as denitrification are often transport-limited and instream restoration structures have been proposed to enhance hyporheic exchange and nutrient removal. However, the comparative effects of instream structure types and watershed setting (i.e. environmental characteristics such as sediment hydraulic conductivity, stream slope) are still poorly understood. Here we used MIKE SHE to model groundwater and surface water interaction and nitrate removal (denitrification) in a 200 m second order stream reach. We simulated various in-stream structures (channel-spanning weirs, partially spanning structures such as cross veins, buried structures) and investigated the effect of controlling environmental characteristics that vary with watershed setting. We found that the environmental characteristics had the greatest effect on surface water-groundwater exchange and therefore denitrification, including streambed hydraulic conductivity, natural or background stream topography and slope, and groundwater levels. Type and number of instream structures also influenced surface water-groundwater exchange and denitrification, but to a lesser degree. Human effects at the watershed scale from agriculture and urbanization likely play a role in whether reach-scale restoration practices succeed in achieving water quality goals both through effect on exchange itself (e.g., altering bed sediment texture) and on nitrate sources. More broadly, restoration efforts at the watershed scale itself, such as reducing fertilizer use or improving stormwater management, may be necessary to achieve ambitious water quality goals. Nevertheless, reach-scale restoration efforts such as in-stream structures may play a useful role in certain watershed settings, for example where groundwater conditions induce neither strong gaining nor strong losing conditions. The interaction of reachscale modifications and watershed setting must be understood to optimize nutrient removal from stream restoration through enhanced hyporheic exchange.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available