4.7 Article

Voluntary Contributions to Hiking Trail Maintenance: Evidence From a Field Experiment in a National Park, Japan

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 124-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.032

Keywords

Donation; Field experiment; Information provision; National park; Park management; Voluntary contribution

Funding

  1. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (the Environmental Economics and Policy Study)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K00697]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17KT0076] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Donation is one of the most important solutions to inadequate funding for protected area management; however, there has been little agreement on the measures to be used to encourage visitors to donate. We conducted a field experiment in Daisetsuzan National Park, Japan, to examine the effect on donation behavior of providing information about two types of initial contributions. The first type of contribution is toward the fundraising campaign for trail maintenance and the initial amount of government funding (i.e., seed money) and information is provided about the target amount. The second type is for trail maintenance and information is provided on the value of one day's contribution by other participants. We found that announcing the seed money amount and the target significantly increased the probability of a positive contribution and raised the average contribution, compared with the control treatment of no additional announcements. When the participants knew others' contribution beforehand, the likelihood of a positive contribution increased; however, the average contribution tended to decrease. In conclusion, announcing the seed money and the fundraising target is superior to the other measures studied in this paper to raise funds in this specific context of protected area management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available