4.3 Article

Patterns of Bird-Bacteria Associations

Journal

ECOHEALTH
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 627-641

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-018-1342-5

Keywords

Microbial; Literature; Pathogen; Antibiotic resistance; Avian

Funding

  1. NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) UCLA CTSI [UL1TR001881]
  2. UCLA Faculty Career Development Award
  3. Hellman Fellowship
  4. Whitcome Undergraduate Research Scholarship
  5. National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM103427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Birds, with their broad geographic ranges and close association with humans, have historically played an important role as carriers of human disease and as reservoirs for drug-resistant bacteria. Here, we examine scientific literature over a 15-year timespan to identify reported avian-bacterial associations and factors that may impact zoonotic disease emergence by classifying traits of bird species and their bacteria. We find that the majority of wild birds studied were migratory, in temperate habitats, and in the order Passeriformes. The highest diversity of bacteria was found on birds in natural habitats. The most frequently reported bacteria were Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Campylobacter jejuni. Of the bacteria species reported, 54% have shown pathogenicity toward humans. Percentage-wise, more pathogens were found in tropical (vs. temperate) habitats and natural (vs. suburban, urban, or agricultural) habitats. Yet, only 22% were tested for antibiotic resistance, and of those tested, 75% of bacteria species were resistant to at least one antibiotic. There were no significant patterns of antibiotic resistance in migratory versus non-migratory birds, temperate versus tropical areas, or different habitats. We discuss biases in detection and representation, and suggest a need for increased sampling in non-temperate zones and in a wider range of avian species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available