4.7 Review

Nanomedicine safety in preclinical and clinical development: focus on idiosyncratic injection/infusion reactions

Journal

DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 1034-1042

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.11.006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation (Det Strategiske Forskningsrad) [09-065746]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research, Technology and Production Sciences [12-126894, 1335-00150b]
  3. Lundbeckfonden [R100-A9443]
  4. International Science and Technology Cooperation of Guangdong Province [2015A050502002]
  5. Guangzhou City [2016201604030050]
  6. RiboBio Co, Ltd, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Injection/infusion reactions to nanopharmaceuticals (and particulate drug carriers) are idiosyncratic and well documented. The molecular basis of nanoparticle-mediated injection reactions is debatable, with two hypotheses as front-runners. The first is complement-activation-related 'pseudoallergy', where a causal role for nanoparticle-mediated complement activation in injection/infusion reactions is considered. However, the second hypothesis (the rapid phagocytic response hypothesis) states a transitional link from robust clearance of nanoparticles (NPs) from the blood by strategically placed responsive macrophages to adverse hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary reactions, regardless of complement activation. Here, I critically examine and discuss these hypotheses. Current experimentally derived evidence appears to be more in support of the rapid phagocytic response hypothesis than of the 'pseudoallergy' hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available