4.5 Article

Juvenile justice, mental health, and the transition to adulthood: A review of service system involvement and unmet needs in the US

Journal

CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 139-148

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.014

Keywords

Transition age youth; Juvenile justice; Mental health; Service utilization; Evidence-based practice

Funding

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, through American Institutes for Research) [280-03-4200]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health [K23DA034879]
  3. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education [H133B090018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although adolescents are the primary focus of juvenile justice, a significant number of young people involved with this system are considered transition age youth (i.e., 16-25 years of age). The aims of this review are to summarize the specific needs of transition age youth with mental health conditions involved with the juvenile justice system, identify the multiple service systems relevant to this group, and offer recommendations for policies and practice. A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify and synthesize the literature. Findings highlight the paucity of research specific to transition age youth. Thus, we also summarized relevant research on justice-involved adolescents, with a focus evaluating its potential relevance in the context of the unique milestones of the transition age, including finishing one's education, setting and working towards vocational goals, and transitioning from one's family of origin to more independent living situations. Existing programs and initiatives relevant to transition age youth with mental health conditions are highlighted, and nine specific recommendations for policy and practice are offered. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available