4.2 Article

ATTUNING TO THE CHEMOSPHERE: Domestic Formaldehyde, Bodily Reasoning, and the Chemical Sublime

Journal

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 368-393

Publisher

SOC CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY
DOI: 10.14506/ca30.3.02

Keywords

phenomenology; anthropology of science; affect; chemical exposure; bodily reasoning

Categories

Funding

  1. Oxford's Phillip Bagby Bequest
  2. Chemical Heritage Foundation
  3. European Research Council under European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [313347]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [313347] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic domestic chemical exposures unfold over protracted timelines and with low velocity. In this article I argue that such microscopic encounters between bodies and toxicants are most readily sensed by less nameable and more diffuse sensory practices. The apprehension of conventionally insensible toxic exposures is informed by sustained attention to barely perceptible alterations of somatic function and atmosphere. Slight biochemical impressions, which at first appear simply meaningless or puzzling, accumulate in the bodies of the exposed and reorient them to the molecular constituents of the air and the domestic infrastructure from which such chemicals emanate. Through the articulation of these small corrosive happenings, residents of contaminated homes can accumulate minute changes to body and atmosphere across time and space in a process I call the chemical sublime, which elevates minor enfeebling encounters into events that stir ethical consideration and potential intervention. The chemical sublime is a late industrial experience that inverts an Enlightenment-era, yet still dominant, conception of the sublime. Across authoritative and questioned bodies, companion species and humans, this essay asks: in what ways do diffuse sensory practices generate knowledge of, attention to, and engagements with the chemical world?

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available