Journal
DIGITAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 25, Issue -, Pages 116-120Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2018.04.004
Keywords
Accreditation; Certification; Expert evidence; ISO 17025; ISO 17020; ISO 9000; Criminal Procedure Rules
Ask authors/readers for more resources
There are three apparent competing routes to providing re-assurance about the quality of digital forensics work: accredit the individual expert, accredit the laboratory and its processes, let the courts test via its procedures. The strengths and weaknesses of each are discussed against the variety of activities within forensic science. The particular problems of digital forensics, including its complexity and rate of change, are reviewed. It is argued that formal standards may not always be practical or value for money compared with advisory good practice guides. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available