4.4 Article

Circulating microRNA-22-3p Predicts the Malignant Progression of Precancerous Gastric Lesions from Intestinal Metaplasia to Early Adenocarcinoma

Journal

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
Volume 63, Issue 9, Pages 2301-2308

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5106-4

Keywords

Gastric epithelial dysplasia; miRNAs; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Liquid biopsy; Intestinal metaplasia; Dysplasia

Funding

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan [CMRPG3D1392]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Gastric cancer has a poor outcome and identifying useful biomarkers from peripheral blood or tissue could allow its early detection, or potentially precancerous changes, thus improving the curative rates. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to offer great potential in cancer diagnosis and prediction. Aim Here, we investigated the role of plasma miRNAs in the natural course of gastric cancer, from intestinal metaplasia to early cancer. The findings were used to understand whether patients at a high risk of malignancy could be given appropriate interventions in the early disease process, such as using endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer. Methods Participants were divided into healthy control, intestinal metaplasia (IM), and dysplasia/early cancer (pT1a/b) groups. Microarray was used to select potential markers in tissue. Results Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data showed circulating miRNA-22-3p had significantly different expression in patients with precancerous lesions or gastric adenocarcinoma. The areas under the curve of incomplete IM versus healthy control, low-grade/high-grade dysplasia, early gastric cancer, and GED were 0.8080, 0.8040, 0.8494, and 0.8095, respectively (all P values < 0.05). Conclusions Circulating miRNA-22-3p could be a potential biomarker for gastric precancerous dysplasia and early cancer detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available