4.3 Article

Relationships beiween Radiation and Canopy Closure Estimates in Streamside Buffers in Western Oregon

Journal

FOREST SCIENCE
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 559-569

Publisher

SOC AMER FORESTERS
DOI: 10.5849/forsci.13-191

Keywords

riparian buffers; radiation; basal area; canopy closure estimators

Categories

Funding

  1. OSU Forest Watershed Research Coop.
  2. Starker Forests, Inc.
  3. Plum Creek Timber Company
  4. Roseburg Forest Products Co.
  5. Forest Capital Partners, Inc.
  6. Hull-Oakes Lumber Co.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintenance of buffers for avoiding excessive increases in stream temperature for protecting cold water fisheries is prominent in riparian rules for forested streams in the Pacific Northwest. Four fish-bearing streams with basins of 250-400 ha in western Oregon were studied to determine how arrangement and amount of streamside buffers in clearcut units influenced riparian environments. Buffer designs included no-tree buffers, partial buffers 12 m wide, and iwo-sided buffers 15-30 m wide. Incident solar radiation estimates from fisheye photographs were compared to visual estimates of canopy closure, densiometer estimates of canopy closure, and basal area. Based on individual sample points, regression analyses of radiation estimates resulted in r(2) values of 0.65 for visual estimates of canopy closure; 0.72 for spherical densiometer, directed south; 0.52 for basal area from in-stream sample points placed at 30-m intervals; and 0.63 for basal area from inventory points 15 m from the stream. High variability existed around all of the lines; r(2) values increased 0.10-0.30 when unit means were used. Canopy closure estimators, such as densiometers, can offer less time-consuming and less expensive methods than direct measures of radiation to estimate the amount of radiation that might reach a stream through streamside buffers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available