4.7 Article

RAGE Deletion Confers Renoprotection by Reducing Responsiveness to Transforming Growth Factor-beta and Increasing Resistance to Apoptosis

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 960-973

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db17-0538

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation
  2. Diabetes Australia Research Trust
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. Vera Dalgleish Phillips Fellowship
  5. Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Signaling via the receptor of advanced glycation end products (RAGE)-though complex and not fully elucidated in the setting of diabetes-is considered a key injurious pathway in the development of diabetic nephropathy (DN). We report here that RAGE deletion resulted in increased expression of fibrotic markers (collagen I and IV, fibronectin) and the inflammatory marker MCP-1 in primary mouse mesangial cells (MCs) and in kidney cortex. RNA sequencing analysis in MCs from RAGE(-/-) and wild-type mice confirmed these observations. Nevertheless, despite these gene expression changes, decreased responsiveness to transforming growth factor-beta was identified in RAGE(-/-) mice. Furthermore, RAGE deletion conferred a more proliferative phenotype in MCs and reduced susceptibility to staurosporine-induced apoptosis. RAGE restoration experiments in RAGE(-/-) MCs largely reversed these gene expression changes, resulting in reduced expression of fibrotic and inflammatory markers. This study highlights that protection against DN in RAGE knockout mice is likely to be due in part to the decreased responsiveness to growth factor stimulation and an antiapoptotic phenotype in MCs. Furthermore, it extends our understanding of the role of RAGE in the progression of DN, as RAGE seems to play a key role in modulating the sensitivity of the kidney to injurious stimuli such as prosclerotic cytokines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available