3.8 Article

Preliminary study on the expression of Toll-like receptors 7 and 8 in bladder urothelial tumors

Journal

UROLOGIA JOURNAL
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages 226-228

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/uro.5000121

Keywords

Bladder; TLR; TCC; Toll-like; Transitional cell carcinomas; TURB; Urotelioma

Funding

  1. University of Sassari to purchase the polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) [sc25467, sc-30004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the expression of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-8 and to confirm the expression of TLR-7 on bladder transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) analyzing the changes in expression between low-grade (LG) and high-grade (HG) and between non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancers. In our study, 25 patients who underwent transurethral resection (TURB) for bladder TCC have been selected. Thirteen of those had an LG form, while the other cases were classified as HG; the lesions were NMIBC in 18 patients and MIBC in the others seven. The analysis of TLRs expression has been performed by immuno histochemistry. TRL-8 expression seems to be higher in MIBC (85%) than in NMIBC (78%), but it is associated with a reduced percentage of immuno reactive cells and with a lower intensity. The expression had a large nuclear localization in NMIBC (80%), althoughit was mainly cytoplasmic in MIBC (72%). TLR-7 was expressed in all NMIBC samples (where the localization was mainly nucleo-cytoplasmic) and in the 71% of MIBC samples (mainly in the nucleus). A higher expression of TRL-8 in HG TCC had been observed, while TRL-7 seems to be more expressed in LG forms. Our study allowed to document the immunohistochemical expression of TLR-8 in TCCs, confirm the immunohistochemical expression of TLR-7, and suggest an increased expression of TLR-7 in LG TCC and NMIBC, and a prevalent expression of TLR-8 in HG TCC and MIBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available