4.7 Article

Impact of surface porosity on water flux and structural parameter in forward osmosis

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 439, Issue -, Pages 46-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2018.03.027

Keywords

Forward osmosis; Structural parameter; Surface porosity; Bulk porosity; Pore geometry; Water flux

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, Information/Communication Technology and Future Planning (2017, University-Institute Cooperation Program)
  2. KOICA/WFK Scholarship - Korea International Cooperation Agency [2015-042]
  3. Future Research Program - Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) [2E28120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving water flux is a crucial objective of research in forward osmosis (FO) technology. A structural parameter is the property of the support layer of the membrane that determines the internal concentration polarization, which is determined by the bulk porosity, tortuosity, and thickness of the support layer. Surface porosity, i.e., porosity at the interface between the active and support layers, has recently been recognized as another critical factor in determining the water flux behavior and the structural parameter. In this study, the relative importance of the surface porosity, bulk porosity, and pore geometry of the support layer on water flux behavior is investigated using a recently developed pore-scale CFD simulator. To this end, various straight-like pore geometries with different combinations of surface and bulk porosities are studied. An increase in bulk porosity reduces internal concentration polarization, thereby increasing effective osmotic pressure. However, for the same magnitude of increase, an increase in surface porosity leads to a significantly larger increase in water flux. We show that water flux is most sensitive to surface porosity, and inconsistency in the structural parameter can be resolved by introducing surface porosity into the FO modeling framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available