3.8 Article

Understanding Complex Systems Through Mental Models and Shared Experiences: A Case Study

Journal

SIMULATION & GAMING
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 536-562

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1046878115621463

Keywords

complex systems; governance; mental model development; participation; positive learning; professionals; shared experiences; SIMPORT-MV2; simulation games; socio-technical systems; students

Funding

  1. ProRail under the Railway Gaming Suite program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Our world today is made up of complex, socio-technical systems like large infrastructure systems, global logistic chains and information networks. Simulation games represent one way to enable participation and governance of such systems. Aim. The current study explores the development of mental models and shared experiences of professionals and students through a simulation game. Method. The simulation game SIMPORT-MV2 focused on the development of a new port area in the Port of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Insights in the perceived development of mental models were measured through questionnaires and through observations in the debriefing. Likewise, observations in the debriefing were obtained for measurements of shared experiences. Results. Results showed that participants perceived positive learning on their declarative, procedural and strategic knowledge (mental model) about the port project. A significant difference was found for both the overall perceived knowledge and the strategic knowledge between students and professionals. Furthermore, qualitative findings showed that players are enabled to probe designs of, to gain insights into, and to develop an understanding of complex systems in a safe environment through shared experiences. Conclusions. This study shows that it is possible to design a simulation game that represents such a complex socio-technical system based on a layered approach of agent, network and system behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available