4.7 Article

HUBBLE TARANTULA TREASURY PROJECT. II. THE STAR-FORMATION HISTORY OF THE STARBURST REGION NGC 2070 IN 30 DORADUS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 811, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/76

Keywords

galaxies: star clusters: individual (30 Doradus, NGC 2070); Hertzsprung-Russell and C-M diagrams; Magellanic Clouds; stars: formation; stars: pre-main sequence

Funding

  1. Collaborative Research Center The Milky Way System of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB881, B5]
  2. Italian PRIN-MIUR [2010LY5N2T]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [GO 1659/3-2]
  4. NASA through Space Telescope Science Institute under NASA [12939, NAS 5-26555]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the recent star formation (SF) of 30 Doradus in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) using the panchromatic imaging survey Hubble Tarantula Treasury Project. In this paper we focus on the stars within 20 pc of the center of 30 Doradus, the starburst region NGC 2070. We recovered the SF history by comparing deep optical and near-infrared color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) with state-of-the-art synthetic CMDs generated with the latest PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code (PARSEC) models, which include all stellar phases from pre-main-sequence to post-main-sequence. For the first time in this region we are able to measure the SF using intermediate-and low-mass stars simultaneously. Our results suggest that NGC 2070 experienced prolonged activity. In particular, we find that the SF in the region (1) exceeded the average LMC rate approximate to 20 Myr ago, (2) accelerated dramatically approximate to 7 Myr ago, and (3) reached a peak value 1-3 Myr ago. We did not find significant deviations from a Kroupa initial mass function down to 0.5 M-circle dot. The average internal reddening E(B - V) is found to be between 0.3 and 0.4 mag.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available