4.7 Article

Correlation between structural stability of LiBH4 and cation electronegativity in metal borides: an experimental insight for catalyst design

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 47, Issue 14, Pages 4987-4993

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt00435h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Public Welfare Research and Capacity Building Project of Guangdong [2015A010105028]
  2. Open Fund of the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advance Energy Storage Materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanosized metal borides MBx (M = Mg, Ti, Fe, Si) are found to play an important role in enhancing the hydrogen storage performance of LiBH4 in this work. The hydrogen storage behavior and mechanism of these modified systems are investigated through TPD-MS, XRD, FTIR and SEM characterization methods. By introducing these metal borides into LiBH4 through ball milling, the systems display three dehydrogenation stages disclosing their similarity and distinction. The 1(st) stage starts at 190 degrees C, the 2(nd) stage ranges from 280 degrees C to 400 degrees C and the 3(rd) stage ends at 550 degrees C with a peak at round 440 degrees C similar to that of pristine LiBH4. Distinguishing features exist at the 2(nd) stage revealing the effectiveness of MBx in an order of MgB2 < TiB2 < FeB < SiB4. Significantly, reversibility up to 9.7 wt% is achieved from LiBH4 with assistance of SiB4. The catalytic effect of MBx is influenced by the Pauling electronegativity of M in MBx and the interfacial contact characteristic between LiBH4 and MBx. The larger electronegativity leads to an enhanced catalytic effect and consequently lower temperature at the major stage. In contrast to the components in the solid state, the molten LiBH4 promotes a catalytic effect due to a superior interfacial contact. These results provide an insight into designing high-performance catalysts applied to LiBH4 as a hydrogen storage material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available