4.7 Article

Decay patterns and carbon density of standing dead trees in California mixed conifer forests

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 353, Issue -, Pages 136-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.05.030

Keywords

Decay; Carbon; Greenhouse gas accounting; Mixed conifer; Snag; Standing dead; Wood density

Categories

Funding

  1. California Energy Commission [500-10-046]
  2. California Air Resources Board [10-778]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dead wood plays important structural and biogeochemical roles in forest ecosystem processes. Some aspects of woody debris dynamics have been carefully studied, but the decay patterns and carbon density Of standing dead (SD) trees are only weakly characterized. Climbing forest mortality rates are also driving increases in the creation and abundance of SD trees. All forms of forest carbon accounting, from stand-level biomass calculations to dynamic earth systems models, are improved by a better understanding of SD tree physical and chemical traits. Using dimensional analysis, we described the patterns of density, carbon concentration, and net carbon density in decaying SD trees of six California mixed conifer species. As decay class advanced, trees showed a progressively lower density and a small increase in carbon concentration. Net carbon density of the most decayed SD trees was only 60% that of live trees. The key characteristics of SD trees that determine these patterns are species, surface to volume ratio, and relative position within the tree. The decay of SD trees and how deadwood biomass is estimated in large scale inventories also have repercussions in greenhouse gas accounting. When the measured changes in carbon density are applied to SD carbon stock estimates for California mixed conifer forests, the decay-adjusted estimates are 3.66-3.74 Tg (18%) lower than estimates that do not incorporate change due to decay. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available