4.1 Article

Development and Validation of a Specific RP-H PLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Antiretroviral Drugs: Application to Nanoparticulate Formulation System

Journal

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 12-23

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573412914666180621110432

Keywords

Etravirine; elvitegravir; HPLC; nanoformulation; AIDS; anti-retro virals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A simple, accurate and economical reverse phase- high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous quantitative estimation of two anti-retro viral drugs, Etravirine and Elvitegravir in nanoparticulate formulations for the first time. This method is a novel analytical technique for the detection of the both the drugs concurrently, as there is no method available for their simultaneous quantification, to the best of our knowledge. Methods: Optimization and validation of the chromatographic conditions were completed according to the standard ICH guidelines. The separation was done on a C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 mu m) using methanol and phosphate buffer of pH (5.6) as the mobile phase in the ratio 78:22 v/v at a flow rate of 1 ml/min for a short run time of 13 min. The detection wavelength was 285 nm and the column temperature was maintained at 32 degrees C. Results: The developed method was linear over 10 to 160 mu g/ml with a regression coefficient of 0.999 for each. The LOD values were 4.83 and 9.25 mu g/ml while LOQ values were 14.63 and 28.01 mu g/ml for etravirine and elvitegravir respectively. The recovery values obtained by etravirine and elvitegravir were between 97.6% and 100.8%. Conclusion: The method was specific, precise, fast and accurate with good inter and intra day precision. The method was also effectively employed for the characterization and simultaneous quantification of both drugs in nanoparticulate formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available