4.5 Review

Neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review of clinical evidence for efficacy, safety, contraindications and predictors for response

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 198-210

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000534

Keywords

deep brain stimulation; drug-resistant epilepsy; neurostimulation; systematic review; vagus nerve stimulation

Funding

  1. 'Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek' (FWO) Flanders
  2. Ghent University Research Fund (BOF)
  3. Ghent University Hospital and E-Epilepsy (EU)
  4. grant of the Ghent Institute of Neuroscience
  5. 'Aspirant' grant of the 'Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek' (FWO) Flanders
  6. European Union
  7. FWF Osterreichischer Fond zur Wissenschaftsforderung
  8. Bundesministerium fur Wissenschaft und Forschung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewNeurostimulation is becoming an increasingly accepted treatment alternative for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are unsuitable surgery candidates. Standardized guidelines on when or how to use the various neurostimulation modalities are lacking. We conducted a systematic review on the currently available neurostimulation modalities primarily with regard to effectiveness and safety.Recent findingsFor vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), there is moderate-quality evidence for its effectiveness in adults with drug-resistant partial epilepsies. Moderate-to-low-quality evidence supports the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in patients with DRE. There is moderate-to-very low-quality evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective or well tolerated. For transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS), there are insufficient data to support the efficacy of any of these modalities for DRE. These treatment modalities, nevertheless, appear well tolerated, with no severe adverse events reported.SummaryHead-to-head comparison of treatment modalities such as VNS, DBS and RNS across different epileptic syndromes are required to decide which treatment modality is the most effective for a given patient scenario. Such studies are challenging and it is unlikely that data will be available in the near future. Additional data collection on potentially promising noninvasive neurostimulation modalities like tVNS, TMS, TNS and tDCS is warranted to get a more precise estimate of their therapeutic benefit and long-term safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available