4.5 Article

New perspectives on central amygdala function

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 141-147

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.02.009

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis Research Foundation
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [669582]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  4. National Center of Competenccs in Research: 'SYNAPSY-The Synaptic Bases of Mental Diseases' - SNSF
  5. Heisenberg programme of the German Research Foundation
  6. Young Investigator Awards from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [669582] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA) is a striatum -like structure orchestrating a diverse set of adaptive behaviors, including defensive and appetitive responses [1-3]. Studies using anatomical, electrophysiological, imaging and optogenetic approaches revealed that the CEA network consists of recurrent inhibitory circuits comprised of precisely connected functionally and genetically defined cell types that can select and control specific behavioral outputs [3.4,5',6',7-9,11,12]. While bivalent functionality of the CEA in adaptive behavior has been clearly demonstrated, we are just beginning to understand to which degree individual CEA circuit elements are functionally segregated or overlapping. Importantly, recent studies seem to suggest that optogenetic manipulations of the same, or overlapping cell populations can give rise to distinct, or sometimes even opposite, behavioral phenotypes [5%6%9-12]. In this review, we discuss recent progress in our understanding of how defined CEA circuits can control defensive and appetitive behaviors, and how seemingly contradictory results could point to an integrated concept of CEA function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available