4.5 Article

Multiplex Y-STRs analysis using the ion torrent personal genome machine (PGM)

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 192-196

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.06.012

Keywords

Forensic genetics; Y-STR; Massively parallel sequencing (MPS); Ion torrent personal genome machine (PGM)

Funding

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Research Program [14JG0500400]
  2. Shanghai Research Institute of Criminal Science and Technology Program [2014XCWZZ09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies allow parallel sequencing analyses of many targeted regions of multiple samples at desirable depth of coverage. Routine use of MPS for forensic genetics is on the horizon. In this study, we explore the application of MPS technology in forensic Y-STR analysis. We designed a multiplex assay with 13 Y-STR loci (DYS19, DYS389 I, DYS389 II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS456, DYS635, GATA-H4) for the purpose of MPS. The multiplex Y-STR assay was amplified in 42 unrelated male individuals and amplicons were sequenced simultaneously using the ion torrent personal genome machine (PGM) system. All loci were detected successfully, except for DYS389 II that exhibited a failure rate of 1.8% due to the relatively long amplicon sizes. We observed 7, 3, 2, 6 and 5 new alleles, respectively in DYS389 II, DYS390, DYS437, DYS448 and DYS635 due to the presence of sub-repeat composition differences, and a new allele in DYS438 because of nucleotide substitution. One allele of DYS390 was inconsistent with allele call from conventional capillary electrophoresis (CE) because of 4 bp deletions upstream of the core repeat unit. This study demonstrates that Y-STR typing by MPS can provide more genetic information, holding the promise for high discriminatory power. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available