4.5 Article

Discrimination and quantification of cocaine and adulterants in seized drug samples by infrared spectroscopy and PLSR

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages 297-306

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.09.012

Keywords

Direct analysis; Multivariate analysis; Characterization; Quantification; Chemometrics

Funding

  1. PeQui Project [01.09.0275-00]
  2. CNPq
  3. BRA I90/UNODC/FP
  4. INCTAA/CNPq
  5. INCTBio/CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Middle infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis have been applied for the development of methods to perform both quantitative and qualitative analysis of real drug samples seized by the Brazilian Police Federal (BPF). Currently, quantification of cocaine and determination of adulterants in seizures is performed using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. However, this technique requires a relatively complex sample preparation, higher time of analysis, the destruction of sample and a high cost. In this context, this paper presents a simpler method to quantify cocaine and its major adulterants in seized materials. Out of 375 seizures, taken within a time frame of 2009-2013. A total of 1085 samples were analyzed of which 500 were selected for the calibration set and 585 for the validation set. Cocaine concentration in seized samples was determined by using middle infrared spectroscopy and partial least squares regression (PLSR), obtaining an average prediction error of 3.0% (w/w), precision of 2.0 and 11.8% (w/w) of minimum detectable cocaine concentration in a range varying from 24.2 to 99.9% (w/w). Results indicate that the developed method is able to discriminate between cocaine hydrochloride and free base samples, to quantify cocaine content as well as to estimate the concentration of main adulterants phenacetin, benzocaine, caffeine, lidocaine and aminopyrine. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available