3.8 Article

Systemic antibody response to nano-size calcium phospate biocompatible adjuvant adsorbed HEV-71 killed vaccine

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE RESEARCH
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 88-98

Publisher

KOREAN VACCINE SOC
DOI: 10.7774/cevr.2015.4.1.88

Keywords

Human enterovirus 71; Calcium phosphate; Adjuvanted vaccine; Nanoparticles; Intradermal injections

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Putra Malaysia [04-04-11-1495RU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Since 1980s, human enterovirus-71 virus (HEV-71) is one of the common infectious disease in Asian Pacific region since late 1970s without effective commercial antiviral or protective vaccine is unavailable yet. The work examines the role of vaccine adjuvant particle size and the route of administration on postvaccination antibody response towards HEV-71 vaccine adsorbed to calcium phosphate (CaP) adjuvant. Materials and Methods: First, CaP nano-particles were compared to a commercial microsize and vaccine alone. Secondly, intradermal reduced dosage was compared to the conventional intramuscular immunization. Killed HEV-71 vaccines adsorbed to CaP nano-size (73 nm) and commercial one of micro-size (1.7 mu m) were administered through intradermal, intramuscular, rabbits received vaccine alone and unvaccinated animals. Results: CaP nano-particles adsorbed HEV-71 vaccine displayed higher antibody than the micro-size or unadsorbed vaccine alone, through both parenteral immunization routes. Moreover, the intradermal route (0.5 mu g/mL) of 0.1-mL volume per vaccine dose induced equal IgG antibody level to 1.0-mL intramuscular route (0.5 mu g/mL). Conclusion: The intradermal vaccine adsorbed CaP nano-adjuvant showed safer and significant antibody response after one-tenth reduced dose quantity (0.5 mu g/mL) of only 0.1-mL volume as the most suitable protective, cost effective and affordable formulation not only for HEV-71; but also for developing further effective vaccines toward other human pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available